160+ tested Claude prompt codes. Only 7 actually shift reasoning. The rest change how Claude sounds, not what it thinks.
I ran controlled A/B tests over three months — fresh contexts, fixed task batteries, blind-rated outputs. Here's the research, the free report, and the tools built on top of it.
Buying for your team? Skills 5-Seat Team Pack, $199 →
Not sure where to start? Take the 2-min audit quiz →
L99 · Kill the Hedge
Four products. All built on the same research.
One-time pricing. Lifetime updates. No subscriptions, no seat counts, no upsells.
Industry packs, playbooks, and done-for-you work.
SAP and Salesforce packs are live now at launch prices. Production Playbook and Agent Templates are on waitlists. Or book one of the two engagements I run personally.
Prompt Audit $499 · Custom Agent Build $2,000+
Two fixed-price engagements I run personally — no SDR, no discovery-call gauntlet.
Real testimonials. Real buyers.
“Genuinely the first prompt resource I've used where the author admits half the famous tricks are placebo. The before/after examples settle arguments with my team in seconds — we stopped cargo-culting whatever tweet went viral that week.”
More incoming. Real verified-buyer quotes only — we do not pad this section. Bought something? Reply with a one-line quote and we will add it here (and send a thank-you bonus).
I tested 120 popular Claude codes for three months. Most don't work.
Every “Claude pro tip” thread on the internet is someone's hunch. I got tired of arguing about it, so I built a rig: fresh contexts per trial, a fixed battery of 24 tasks across writing, coding, and analysis, outputs rated blind by three reviewers on decisiveness, accuracy, and token efficiency.
Forty-seven percent of the widely-shared codes showed no significant lift over a plain prompt. The other 53% did — and a handful were genuinely big. The cheat sheet is those 53%, with the failure modes documented for the rest.
Read the full methodology →