FREE
Frontend
requesting-code-review
Use when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to verify work meets requirements
Try it — you'd type
“Help me with requesting-code-review.”
And you'd get back
Use when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to verify work meets requirements
Formatted for Claude, no fluff, no preamble.
Works the same way every time you ask.
Adding it takes about 30 seconds
1
Click Get this skill. Grab the .md file, one click, no account needed.
2
Add it to Claude. Drop it into ~/.claude/skills/. Claude picks it up the next time you open a session.
3
Ask normally. Type your question. The skill triggers on the right keywords — you don't have to remember anything.
You might also like
Component Generator
Generate React/Vue/Svelte components with props
Responsive Layout
Create responsive layouts with Tailwind/CSS Grid
Form Builder
Build forms with validation (React Hook Form, Formik)
State Management Setup
Set up state management (Zustand, Redux, Jotai)
Animation Creator
Create animations with Framer Motion or CSS
Dark Mode Setup
Implement dark/light mode toggle
SKILL FILEWhat Claude actually reads
Dispatch superpowers:code-reviewer subagent to catch issues before they cascade.
**Core principle:** Review early, review often.
## When to Request Review
**Mandatory:**
- After each task in subagent-driven development
- After completing major feature
- Before merge to main
**Optional but valuable:**
- When stuck (fresh perspective)
- Before refactoring (baseline check)
- After fixing complex bug
## How to Request
**1. Get git SHAs:**
```bash
BASE_SHA=$(git rev-parse HEAD~1) # or origin/main
HEAD_SHA=$(git rev-parse HEAD)
```
**2. Dispatch code-reviewer subagent:**
Use Task tool with superpowers:code-reviewer type, fill template at `code-reviewer.md`
**Placeholders:**
- `{WHAT_WAS_IMPLEMENTED}` - What you just built
- `{PLAN_OR_REQUIREMENTS}` - What it should do
- `{BASE_SHA}` - Starting commit
- `{HEAD_SHA}` - Ending commit
- `{DESCRIPTION}` - Brief summary
**3. Act on feedback:**
- Fix Critical issues immediately
- Fix Important issues before proceeding
- Note Minor issues for later
- Push back if reviewer is wrong (with reasoning)
## Example
```
[Just completed Task 2: Add verification function]
You: Let me request code review before proceeding.
BASE_SHA=$(git log --oneline | grep "Task 1" | head -1 | awk '{print $1}')
HEAD_SHA=$(git rev-parse HEAD)
[Dispatch superpowers:code-reviewer subagent]
WHAT_WAS_IMPLEMENTED: Verification and repair functions for conversation index
PLAN_OR_REQUIREMENTS: Task 2 from docs/plans/deployment-plan.md
BASE_SHA: a7981ec
HEAD_SHA: 3df7661
DESCRIPTION: Added verifyIndex() and repairIndex() with 4 issue types
[Subagent returns]:
Strengths: Clean architecture, real tests
Issues:
Important: Missing progress indicators
Minor: Magic number (100) for reporting interval
Assessment: Ready to proceed
You: [Fix progress indicators]
[Continue to Task 3]
```
## Integration with Workflows
**Subagent-Driven Development:**
- Review after EACH task
- Catch issues before they compound
- Fix before moving to next task
**Executing Plans:**
- Review after each batch (3 tasks)
- Get feedback, apply, continue
**Ad-Hoc Development:**
- Review before merge
- Review when stuck
## Red Flags
**Never:**
- Skip review because "it's simple"
- Ignore Critical issues
- Proceed with unfixed Important issues
- Argue with valid technical feedback
**If reviewer wrong:**
- Push back with technical reasoning
- Show code/tests that prove it works
- Request clarification
See template at: requesting-code-review/code-reviewer.md
## When to Use
This skill is applicable to execute the workflow or actions described in the overview.