Claude for research summaries, done properly.
The tested prompt, the codes that help, and the setup healthcare pros run. Copy, adapt, ship.
Staying current with medical literature is a firehose. Hundreds of papers publish weekly in every specialty. Clinicians need the key findings without reading 20-page papers.
Three reasons this actually lands.
The prompt, the codes, the fit. Each one on its own is a nice-to-have. Together, they change the workflow.
One tested prompt, copy-paste ready. Rules baked in, placeholders marked, tone locked down. No prompt-engineering trial runs, no back-and-forth.
Prefix with REASON, V=2, L99 for compound effects. Each code is a documented technique, not a magic word.
Tuned for healthcare workflows. Not a generic template, and not another "you are a helpful assistant" hack.
Without the pattern vs with it.
What the day looks like when you keep winging the prompt, and what it looks like when you stop.
Generic prompt. Claude writes something that could be about anyone, in any industry, from anywhere. Sounds like a template because it is one.
The CLSkills prompt with placeholders for your context. Claude writes it like a specialist who actually knows the work. Publishable after one edit pass.
You paste, Claude answers, you rewrite, you paste again. Ten minutes of back-and-forth per output. Three hours across a batch of five.
Prompt loaded once. You feed the specifics, Claude returns the finished output. Two minutes per, twenty across five. Same tone, same structure, every time.
Middle-of-the-road copy that reads AI-flavoured. Recipients notice. Response rates stay low. You end up rewriting most of it anyway.
A structured 2-minute summary that tells you whether this paper matters for your practice. Includes limitations and context — not just the headline finding. Saves 30+ minutes per paper.
Copy this, replace the placeholders, ship.
Summarize this research paper/study. Paper title: [TITLE] Journal: [WHERE PUBLISHED] Target audience: [CLINICIANS / RESEARCHERS / STUDENTS / GENERAL PUBLIC] Paper text or key sections: [PASTE ABSTRACT + KEY SECTIONS, OR FULL PAPER] Summarize: 1. **One-sentence takeaway**: What did they find? (plain English) 2. **Study design**: Type, size, duration, population 3. **Key findings**: Top 3 results with numbers (effect sizes, p-values, CIs) 4. **Strengths**: What makes this study credible 5. **Limitations**: What weakens the conclusions (funding, sample size, methodology) 6. **Clinical relevance**: Does this change practice? For whom? 7. **Context**: How does this fit with existing evidence on this topic? Format: Use a structured template that's scannable in 2 minutes. Tone: Scientific but accessible. Explain statistics in context. NOTE: This is a summary aid. Clinical decisions should consider the full body of evidence.
Replace the [BRACKETED] placeholders with your context.
Stack these prefixes for compound gains.
Prepend one or more of these to the prompt above. Each code is documented on its own page with before and after examples.
Every prompt, once.
The Cheat Sheet is every tested code, with a before and an after.
Nearby prompts for the same role.
Health literacy is low — most patient materials are written at a college level when the average patient reads at 8th grade. Confusing materi…
CLAUDE FORClinicians spend 2+ hours daily on documentation. SOAP notes, progress notes, and discharge summaries are repetitive but require precision. …